The economically illiterate public reads the Wall Street Journal (?)(!)

Re: Pain from Free Trade Spurs Second Thoughts (WSJ $)

Who in the hell is reading The Journal and buying this protectionist crap? The comments are filled with the stupid, the racist, union members, etc. I understand if you have personally lost your job and didn't figure out how to improve your situation yet you might hold a grudge, but that does not give you the right to STEAL from the whole of society just to make you feel better.

Winners AND losers, yes, there will be losers in every competition. The world is a competition, nobody is going to hold your hand and put food on your plate. (North Korea, the last of the great communist states cannot feed their own citizens.) Is this what people want for their American brothers and sisters?

Okay, enough drama, nobody will take these people seriously, but sometimes they wind up in Congress and they become loaded weapons.

Look, even Alan Blinder is a "free trader down to my toes" and he has simply made a bleeding heart appeal that we should make huge gifts to the people who can't shift with the changing world. Is it okay to feel sorry for someone who loses their job? Yes. Is it a good idea to encourage them to shift their career path, shift their ass to a productive city, shift their attitude towards their own country? Hell Yes!

Dr. Blinder's own student, N. Greg Mankiw was ashamed of the statements made by his evil teacher. Greg seems to feel that Dr. Blinder is resisting new technology. That certainly is not a new problem and whole communities of people, even here in the United States, feel the same way. However, they do not recruit or use rent seeking tactics to restrict the liberty of the World.

Please people, WAKE UP! If you are unhappy, get some professional help, but don't come begging me for a hand out or a hand up, all I have to offer is employment, but... don't faint... you have to WORK for it.

From the WSJ:

What's the net effect of free trade on U.S. employment?

It helps. It hurts. It's neutral. 774 votes (39%) 935 votes (47%) 272 votes (14%)

Total Votes : 1981

From the comments:

Roger Theriualt: Not a single person has been hired because of free trade. And if free trade were not here, we would still be doing well. Operations would be a little different, but that is all. ... Free trade, when raised to the extremes of idealism is toxic to all concerned. Moderation is the answer, some things can go too far.

romesh: remember, US can print US$ in unlimited quantities at no cost and it does so; just look at payments for Iraq war.

Are jobs of WSJ Editors offshoreable to Bangalore (India)?; after all, their work can be done by a person sitting anywhere with an access to a laptop and tele-communications. If so, would the Editors call it Free Trade?

Stephen Carroll: If country A takes 5 hours to produce a product with a labor cost of 20 dollars per hour the cost is 100 dollars. If country B takes 10 hours to produce a product with a labor cost of 5 dollars per hour the cost is 50 dollars. Country B puts country A out of business at the cost of increased man hours worked. The result is a reduction in the world’s productivity.

Dr. jur. Heinz L, Gundlach (Dr? seriously? He works at an M&A firm): we have to stop this crazy free import thinking. Tax foreign firms on their sales in the US (10% of sales) and exit the WTO and again rely on bilateral trade negotiations requiring balanced accounts with each country. Our employment situation must have formost importance. Dr. jur. Heinz L, Gundlach, Palm Beach, Fl..

My talk with Justice Scalia

Well, not exactly a talk, but he did listen and respond to my question. The highlight of the year's speakers was today's visit by Justice Antonin Scalia at the University of Toledo. Justice Scalia was approachable, honest and even entertaining. He worked without notes and never skipped a beat reciting decisions and important historical events throughout the history of our country.

On a side note, there was almost no security presence at either of two venues. There may have been a Federal Marshall, and the University Police came through before the event, but no metal detectors or searches. I was shocked.

During his morning Q&A with the College of Law, I was privileged to have the opportunity to pose a question to one of the world's great legal minds. My humble question related to the conflict among justices on the court and whether this is an important feature of the supreme court or if Chief Justice Roberts is correct to seek more unanimity? Justice Scalia without pause started into a dissertation on the ridiculous thought that courts should be unanimous. He began with a bit of history that under Justice John Marshall the Supreme Court first shifted to a majority opinion from its previous policy of five separate opinions. Justice Scalia opined that this is a dishonest approach on the part of the judges who do not fully agree with the majority opinion.

Justice Scalia took particular pride in his own reputation as the great dissenter because he considers his dissents as honest and provides accountability. He believes he has been consistent through his decisions and the dissent is a public tool for predicting future responses and influencing future judicial and legal minds.

The morning audience, all law students and professors, posed a number of great questions covering the gamut of constitutional questions. Some notable quotes:

Yes, there is a right of privacy... [A European court considered a case,] in what can only be described as a five many homosexual orgy... Somehwere between five men and a full Coliseum the right of privacy ends.

I believe in stare decisis and I accept the mistakes of the court as water over the damn.

I live in this Marble Palace. Hell, I don't know what the evolving standards of decency are. I am afraid to inquire

I am an originalist, but I am not a nut.

I don't think the Supreme Court would affirm... Kelo. The public has turned against the decision.

On his former colleague Justice Sandra Day O'Connor:

If you are ever on the wrong side of a civil procedure question, she will grab you like a dog with a bone and shake you. She lives and dies by [civil procedure].

Regarding oral argument:

It is very rare that oral argument changes my mind, but a persuasive advocate can change my mind.

His considerations for overturning precedent:

1. How wrong was the decision?
2. How wide has the decision been accepted?
3. How does the decision permit me to be a lawyer? [to advise and predict the outcome of a dispute based on the precedent]

Justice Scalia delivered many persuasive arguments for his position as an originalist. The alternative, to consider the Constitution as a "living organism," does not provide any guidance for the role of the courts. If the Constitution, the foundation of our country, is interpreted in light of current "standards of decency" and political climate, it loses its power and all of that power is transferred to the Court. Justice Scalia proposes keeping that power with the people, who voted for and ratified the Constitution. Originalists are not necessarily ultra-conservative, a textual reading of the Constitution does not mean it cannot be changed, merely that changes should come in the form originally proposed: amendments. The Constitution clearly intends changes to come from Congress, not the Court.

I enjoyed the festivities immensely and I look forward to following Justice Scalia and his colleagues more closely.

Al Roker, you cheeky monkey!

After watching a few episodes of the Today show, I have come to the conclusion that, at least since he lost weight, Al Roker is one cheeky monkey. Last week, a conversation was broadcast in which the cast was unaware their microphones were still on during a weather forecast. Meredith or another female cast member told Al to "keep it in your pants."

This morning, Meredith was discussing her desired super hero abilities when Al suggested to Meredith she should watch Heroes, which Matt described as "...ordinary people with supernatural powers."

To which Al replied, "Like the stripper who can do things in the mirror."

It seems Al is doing his part to wake up the morning shift censor.

Andy is getting old

Andy Rooney must be getting old because he does not appear to know what goes on around his office.

He closed his most recent feature with this line, "Copies of my talk are unavailable on either the Internet or the outernet."

You can read the transcript, and watch the clip, here.

His Editor points out Andy's error,

[Editor's Note: Oh, yes, they are – right here on CBSNews.com!]

Super Bowl Ads

Here's my favorite so far:

"By Christ" David Letterman. Bless you Bill O'Reilly

I don't have any more time to concern myself with this issue right now, but I think the title says it all. Last night David Letterman ambushed Bill O'Reilly during an interview on the Late Show. Letterman's responses were uneducated, by his own account. You should view it for yourself. I do not agree with the Hammer of Truth on the issue, but I appreciate their posting the video. Watch it and decide for yourself.

You can read the comments at the bottom of the page and discover how I was kicked out by the libertarians. So much for that.

Minimum Wage Myth

Pointed out today by the CATO Institute's Daily Dispatch, Edward Crane wrote in 1999 in Minimum Wage Myth:

"Even better, why not repeal the Law of Supply and mandate that the cost of food, clothing, shelter and Yankees games be cut by 50%?"

Oh the irony!

BW&V wishes to model his antitrust exam study game after monopoly. He might be Losing It.

It could have been worse, poor Deb Davis

I guess my bus experience wasn't so bad after all.

Reason posts:

The first time she was asked to show identification while riding the bus to work, Deborah Davis was so startled that she complied without thinking. But the more she thought about it, the less sense it made.

That's how Davis, a 50-year-old Colorado woman with four grown children and five grandchildren, ended up getting dragged off the bus by federal security officers, who handcuffed her, took her to their station, and cited her for two misdemeanors. Davis, who is scheduled to be arraigned on December 9, is risking 60 days in jail to show her fellow Americans that they don't need to blindly obey every dictate imposed in the name of security.

Love Molecule

Some Italian scientists believe they have identifed the "love molecule", but the next step is putting it into a bottle and giving that bottle to Tate Donovan to see if he can still seduce Sandra Bullock.

Link

What the Bleep? covered this topic beautifully. If you haven't seen it, get it now!

Columbus v. SCOTUS

Columbus is well represented at the Supreme Court this week. Today some students attempted to steal pieces of the building: link.

Tomorrow, Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc., a Dublin, OH company, will be defending its service contract and 300% interest loans: link.

I am so proud. <*sarcasm*>


What is SCOTUS?

The Tutoring Toy

My aunt and uncle own a toy store in Salt Lake City Utah called The Tutoring Toy and while we have not finished their website, I was analyzing traffic to their construction page when I stumbled across this review from KSL 1160 Radio from May that is available online: KSL Radio Small Business Resource Center.

It is a fantastic endorsement of their efforts to bring educational toys to children far and wide.

OSU & COTA conspire to take money from my wallet

I should have posted this a week ago. I finished my report and anlalysis of the OSU & COTA "partnership" which charges every student $9 per quarter in exchange for unlimited use of the COTA system. You can read the entire report here (PDF).

In summary, OSU has done a horrible job monitoring this contract. They put the task of monitoring performance in the hands of a loosely allied group of students and administrators. The group rarely meets and has difficulty reaching quorum at every meeting. Despite the University's vast resources in statistics, urban planning, economics and GIS it seems that none of these departments were tapped to take an honest look at COTA's performance of the contract. COTA has failed to attract sufficient student use to justify even on a basic utilitarian level the total expenditure. Despite being COTA's largest single customer, OSU is paying on average $1.29 per ride when the public fare is only $1.25 (though the public fare will rise next year). By purchasing in bulk OSU has significantly reduced the transaction costs for COTA but OSU is not benefiting from a reduction in fees.

This program should be ended. The 3,400 (< 10% of the population) or so students who use COTA can pay for their own bus services.

Checking it twice...

It has finally turned cold and we have seen our first snow here in Ohio, but on the island in Lost they seem to have begun preparing for Christmas on Wednesday. Consider this dialogue:

Goodwin (aka Mr. Claus): "Nathan was not a good person. That's why he wasn't on the list."
Anna (aka Mrs. Claus): "What about the kids?"

Then Mrs. Claus proceeds to kill Mr. Claus. That island is a strange place.

Ohio Election Roundup

Tomorrow is election day here in Ohio. Many important issues are on the ballot and it is YOUR responsibility to voice your opinion at the polls. Whether you agree or disagree with my position, I urge you to vote tomorrow. Do not let long lines, registration problems or the weather discourage you from being heard.

To help you sort out the issues here is some information about important issues on the ballot tomorrow in Central Ohio and around the state. Feel free to print this out and take it with you to the polls. This website does not receive any compensation and is not affiliated with any political party or candidate. The views expressed here are solely those of the author.
Official GOP Slate Cards

State Issues

• Issue 1: Third Frontier Bond Issue
  Recommend: Vote No!
  Why? In a state where our spending is already out of control, we do not need more state sponsored bonds that will go to fund special interest run businesses. Bob Taft wishes to gain more control over the state's businesses and money and direct which private industries get public funding. By reducing taxes and regulation the market will efficiently direct investment and education to the most efficient businesses.
  Results: Passed
  


• Issue 2: Broaden Absentee Voting Access
  Recommend: Vote No!
  Why?: This bill unnecessarily opens a 35 day window for the general public voting period. If a large number of voters take advantage of early voting, the resulting situation highly favors large political party candidates with the most funding who can afford to get their message out early and sustain the effort for more than a month before the election. You likely have only been intently interested in the issues for about a week. A great deal of information and opinion formation occurs just days or hours before an election, and lengthening the voting window to 35 days creates an impossible situation for less well known candidates.
  Result: Failed.
  



• Issue 3: Campaign contribution reform
  Recommend: Vote No!
  Why?: Just look at the length of the ballot text: 945 words!! If you can understand this amendment you are a better person than I. This makes campaign contributions very complicated and only candidates with a large staff will be able to handle the 24 hour turn around time for the mandatory reporting. This amendment does not favor democracy.
  Result: Failed.
  



• Issue 4: Congressional Redistricting
  Recommend: Vote No!
  Why?: Another complicated bill designed to keep the general public from understanding the legislative process. It does seem to me that it is a bad idea to put the redistricting powers in the hands of appointed individuals.
  Result: Failed.
  



• Issue 5: Elections Board
  Recommend: Vote No!
  Why?: See Issue 4. Today we each have an opportunity to vote for the Secretary of State and every 4 years the public can influence the policy of our state elections. Shifting this responsibility to an appointed board will remove the power from the people and hide the elections policy behind another layer of untouchable bureaucracy.
  Result: Failed.
  

Local Issues & Candidates - Franklin County

• Clerk of Courts
  Recommend: Mike Pirick.
  Why?: This Republican incumbent implemented many e-services while in office and customer service is his #1 issue.
  Result: Tyack.
  


• Municipal Court Judge

Recommend:


• Judge Mike Brandt


• Judge Amy Salerno


• Isabella Thomas


• Judge Dwayne Maynard



Why?: Because they are Republican. Absent any personal contact with these judges it is practically impossible to tell how they will serve and where they stand on any issues. So all I can do is hope the political party does the best job possible in picking great candidates.

Result:



• Judge Dwayne Maynard


• Judge Amy Salerno


• Judge Michael Brandt


• Judge Andrea Peebles






• ADAMH Tax Levy Replacement
  Recommend: Vote No!
  Why?: As best I can tell, the county is not an efficient medical provider. The money would be better spent with a charity or private provider.
  Result: Passed
  

City of Dublin - Issues & Candidates

• City Council - Ward 2
  Recommend: Amy Salay
  Why?: A stay-at-home mom who helped implement the Traffic Enforcement Unit of the police. The challenger, Richard Gerber, favors raising taxes to increase the number of city services, increase green space and remove all of our remaining private property rights. (That last part was my interpretation reading between the lines.)
  Result: Elected
  



• Dublin School Board
  Recommend:
  
  
  • Bill Burton
  
  
  • Stuart Harris
  
  
  • Lisa Huang
  
  
  
  Why?: These candidates favor honors and AP classes and wish to raise the level of performance.
  Result:
  
  
  
  • Stu Harris
  
  
  • Gwen Callendar
  
  
  • Lynn May
  
  
  
  


• Washington Township Trustee
  Recommend:
  
  
  • Chuck Kranstuber
    Why?: Highly experienced and in favor of efficient, high quality services.
  
  
  • Denise King
    Why?: Incumbent and efficient. Helped install red light management for EMS vehicles.
  
  Result: Elected!
  
  
  
  

For more information please visit these websites:
Dublin Suburban News
Franklin County Board of Elections
Ohio Secretary of State
Ohio GOP - Arguments against Issues 2 - 5
Ohio Libertarian Party Analysis of Issues 1 - 5

"The torture continues..."

Thanks to the VC for the pointer to an interview with Justice Kennedy. Kennedy, thanks to decisions like Kelo, is not at the top of my list of legal heroes. He does, however, hold one of the nine most powerful legal seats in the world, and so I read the interview anyway.

If you wish to read about his childhood, start at page one, but otherwise the best stuff is starts on page 3. The best question, which revealed Kennedy's inspirations, was almost the last and is a staple of the Academy of Achievement,they asked, "What books would you read to your grandchildren? What are the important books to you?" Here is Justice Kennedy's response:

I think fiction is very important because it gets us into the mind of a person. Hamlet is a tremendous piece of literature. You know Hamlet better than you know most real people. Do you know the reason? Because you know what he's thinking. And this teaches you that every human has an integrity and an autonomy and a spirituality of his own, of her own, and great literature can teach you that. Billy Budd, Antigone, are very important works. Antigone is brilliant. You know, in literature, the woman is a symbol of mercy and of equity: Antigone, Portia -- Rosa Parks, to use a real person. That's why Justice is a woman, even though she has a sword sometimes. I don't know if that fits, but so: Antigone, The Merchant of Venice, Hamlet, Billy Budd, Nineteen Eighty-Four. You and I grew up with a great fear of the Soviet military might. Nineteen Eighty-Four has one of the brilliant scenes in literature. The protagonist is being tortured by his communist or totalitarian interrogators, and they want him to say that "Two and two is five." And finally he can't stand the torture anymore, he says, "Okay, two and two is five." But the torture continues. He said, "Why are you continuing?" They say, "The torture continues not until you just say it, but until you believe it." And this is a powerful reminder that governments want to plan your destiny. They want to plan what you think, and this must never happen. And so Nineteen Eighty-Four is a book of tremendous importance, I think, in that regard.

So Justice Kennedy believes the government should keep their dirty little paws off my destiny. I'm not sure how that jives with his liberal record of decisions, but he is absolutely right. I have not yet read 1984, but you can bet that is now on my short list and my froogle list. I hope to see Justice Kennedy use the "1984" judicial test for more of his decisions.

FOIA, Public Records & Sunshine

Over the past year I have given myself a crash course in public records law. First there was the SEI campaign to capture the information the University collects about instructor evaluation. I successfully collected the data, but it was in such an unusable format that I have not done anything with it. I think it is about time to make another request for the data for the last year.

A few weeks ago, I began requesting data necessary to evaluate the efficiency of OSU's COTA bus fee. Eventually I was able to get the ridership statistics and later today I should finally be able to get the financial details of all payments made from OSU to COTA.

I have learned a few things from this process.

1. Government emmployees want to keep their performance secret.


2. Government employees are completely unaware of the existence or substance of public records law


3. Common government tactics to avoid releasing records: feigning ignorance, forwarding to supervisors and other departments, delivering incorrect or incomplete records.


4. Persistence, persistence, persistence.


5. While you get more bees with honey, threatening a lawsuit improves the chances of being the squeaky wheel who gets the grease.

Outsourcing

Dan Drezner posted a brilliant summary on the benefits of outsourcing.

Does America benefit from outsorcing? Hell yes!

Is it difficult to tell your neighbor that he needs to lose his job because you don't want to pay $10 for a $2 hand-made corn broom? Yes. Is it worth $8 to avoid the conversation? No.

V2V - Intelligent Design?

This week, GM announced a new vehicle technology called, V2V (vehicle-to-vehicle) communication. Used in conjuction with GPS and in-car sensors, GM proposes to allow vehicles to communicate speed, position and other status indicators such as a hard-braking condition to all of the vehicles within a quarter mile.

Sounds too good to be true right? GM intends to prevent blind-spot accidents and rear-end accidents into stopped traffic, and notify drivers of approaching emergency vehicles, traffic congestion and other "traffic intelligence."

GM failed to mention this, but it also eliminates the need for radar and laser speed detectors. Police can just watch a monitor with the speed of every car on the road, from their cruiser or the station or maybe they'll outsource speeding tickets to India. Also, criminals may be able to use this technology to evade the police. If police cruiser V2V transponders can be identified, then criminals can watch their own monitor to avoid crossing paths with the five-oh.

On a brighter note, maybe V2V can be used as a dating service. When two single people pull up to a traffic light together, V2V will hail the other vehicle and you can get a peak of your anonymous drive-through date before approving the transfer of your phone number to the other car.

Endless possibilities for this intelligent design. (Do you think using the phrase "intelligent design" is going to create a spike in readership?)

Hat tip to Wired.

ABC News: Strikes, protests put pressure on French govt

ABC News: Strikes, protests put pressure on French govt: "The strike was called by all of France's main trade unions over low pay, a high unemployment of 9.9 percent of the workforce, falling living standards and a new law which makes it easier for small firms to sack staff. They also want to preserve the 35-hour working week."

That is the funniest thing I have ever heard! We want more pay, but we won't work more than 35 hours a week and we want lower unemployment.

Do the French think that money grows on trees?